Noida: A recent video shared on social media by Ghulam Haider, Seema Haiders first husband from Pakistan, has stirred up controversy, reigniting allegations of assault against Seema Haider in India. The video purportedly shows Seema Haider injured after an altercation, prompting heated discussions across India and Pakistan.Allegations by Ghulam HaiderIn the video, Ghulam Haider accuses Seema Haider, who migrated from Pakistan to India, of assaulting him and mistreating their children. He further alleges that Sachin Meena, reportedly Seemas partner, is involved in illicit drug consumption, claiming that Sachin smokes charas. Ghulam Haider substantiates his claims by sharing a video and photo of the altercation with Seema Haider on social media.चेहरे पर चोट के निशान और सचिन पर सीमा हैदर को पीटने का आरोप!यह वीडियो सोशल मीडिया पर वायरल हो रहा है..हालाँकि सीमा हैदर के वकील ने इस वीडियो को फेक बताया है#GreaterNoida #seemahaider #SachinMeena #Pakistan #viralvideo pic.twitter.com/kAhi7yMY19— Surabhi Tiwari🇮🇳 (@surabhi_tiwari_) April 8, 2024Response from Seema Haiders lawyerSeema Haiders lawyer, AP Singh, has vehemently refuted all allegations made by Ghulam Haider, denouncing the shared video and images as fabricated and misleading. AP Singh asserts that the circulated content is manipulated and distributed with malicious intent. He maintains that Seema Haider and Sachin Meena are leading a peaceful life together, dismissing Ghulam Haiders accusations as baseless.Ghulam Haider targeting AP SinghIn the viral video, Ghulam Haider also targets lawyer AP Singh, alleging his complicity in the purported assault on Seema Haider. He criticizes AP Singh for his passive stance during the altercation, questioning his integrity and allegiance. Despite the accusations, AP Singh remains steadfast in defending his client and refuting the claims made against him.The emergence of the viral video alleging assault on Seema Haider has sparked intense debate and scrutiny, highlighting the complexities of interpersonal relationships and legal battles. As both parties engage in a war of words, the truth behind the incident remains contested, underscoring the need for a thorough investigation to ascertain the veracity of the claims made by each side.
