Can Musk's Neuralink cure cancer? American neuroscientist's phenomenal claims

Describing Neuralink's functionality, Cerf explained that the device, once implanted in the human head, can establish connections both within the brain and with external cloud resources, including access to the internet.

Author
Edited By: Satyam Singh
Follow us:

X/@twtrdtcm

Prominent Neuroscientist Moran Cerf, professor at Columbia School of Business, engaged in a session at the India Today conclave. The focus of their discussion was centered around Elon Musk's Neuralink, which recently made headlines by implanting its first chip into a human brain.

Cerf, who is known for his expertise in security delved into the essence of Neuralink, highlighting that our brains have remained relatively unchanged for millennia, which has led to inherent limitations in processing the complexities of the modern world. 

Neuralink's functionality with brain

Describing Neuralink's functionality, Cerf explained that the device, once implanted in the human head, can establish connections both within the brain and with external cloud resources, including access to the internet. He emphasized that visionaries like Elon Musk are betting on Neuralink to revolutionize humanity, which can lead to breakthroughs in curing diseases that have stumped our biological brains.

Limitations of Neualink

However, Cerf also pointed out the contrasting views regarding Neuralink's impact. While it holds promise in enhancing human intellect and problem-solving abilities, concerns arise about potential risks, such as hacking into thoughts and creating societal divides between those with implants and those without.

Ethics of AI

The discussion extended to the broader implications of artificial intelligence (AI), with Cerf underlining the importance of establishing ethical guardrails. He drew parallels to historical technological advancements, like nuclear energy, which initially aimed for peaceful purposes but veered towards destructive applications in warfare.

Cerf urged leaders to navigate the delicate balance between technological advancement and ethical considerations, stressing that human decisions ultimately determine the ethical use of technologies like Neuralink. He raised thought-provoking scenarios, such as the potential for individuals with neural implants to isolate themselves from non-augmented humans, potentially leading to societal challenges.