A candidate applying for the post of Supervisor in the Department of Horticulture and Food Processing. He was not selected despite his higher marks than the previous candidates. Hence a commission is held in court regarding this issue. And this is what the advocate said about the recruitment process for the supervisor post. The petitionerIn 2016, the High Court Lucknow bench demanded a reply from the UP Subordinate Services Selection commission level for not selecting an eligible candidate for the supervisor post in the Horticulture and Food Processing department. The bench gave the selection commission ten days to file a reply.Petitioner scored more marks in the examinationOn behalf of the petitioner, Advocate Deepak Singh appeared in the court and explained that the petitioner had scored more marks than the last selected candidate in the UP Subordinate Services Selection Commission, and yet he was not chosen for the post of supervisor in the Department of Horticulture and Food Processing to which the petitioner had applied on 2016.The final result of the selection process was released in December 2021. Only then was it confirmed that his petitioner was selected despite scoring more marks than the last person.High court for justiceEven with the petition being fair, the hearing was not conducted. The corresponding petitioner felt helpless and filed the case in the high court for reasonable justification. The high court has fixed a date for this hearing: March 16th. Until then, the UP Subordinate Services Selection Commission also has ten days to file a reply to the petition.The UP Subordinate Services Selection Commission had not appointed a qualified candidate for the post of Supervisor in the Department of Horticulture and Food Processing. The advocate on behalf explained that the petitioner was competent and had even scored more than the last selected candidate. The hearing was not held on the matter, making the petitioner feel more helpless. With hope, the petitioner had filed the same in the high court for justice. The high court revised the petition and has allowed the UP Subordinate Services Selection commission ten days to file a reply regarding the non-appointment of the eligible candidate.