Ian Chappell proposes change in boundary law, Check details

Cricket legend Ian Chappell has reignited the debate about cricket's declining pace of gameplay by simplifying boundary calls and awarding runs only when the ball hits the rope, regardless of a fielder's touch. 

In a recent ESPNcricinfo column, Chappell urged the top administrators to take action. His boundary suggestion aims to eliminate time-consuming replays and disputes sparked by fielders brushing the rope while stopping the ball. 

A simple solution for complex issue?

The current law allows boundaries if the ball crosses the rope, even if a fielder touches it simultaneously. Chappell advocates for limiting on-field batter conferences, streamlining drinks breaks, and minimizing equipment changes, all in the name of quicker play. He even questions the current review system, suggesting that its frequent use and lengthy consultations drag down the tempo.

He wrote, "Why aren’t boundaries signaled only for balls that hit the rope rather than allowing pointless replays that look at the whereabouts of a fielder’s feet or hands? The pace of play in Test cricket is abysmal. It’s slowing every day and nothing is being done to improve matters."

Opponents, however, counter that it undermines the athleticism and skill of modern fielding. The sight of acrobatic leaps and desperate dives to save boundaries has become a crucial element of the game, creating excitement and showcasing remarkable talent. 

Finding the right balance

The debate reflects a deeper struggle to reconcile cricket's traditional charm with the demands of the modern cricketing landscape. Chappell's boundary tweak strikes the right balance between pace and excitement without sacrificing the essence of the game.