Why not go to the old Parliament building? Akhilesh Yadav after water logging issues at new building | Video

The sharp attack questioning the credibility of the Central government has come from Akhilesh Yadav after visuals of water logging and water leakage in the new Parliament building surfaced on social media.

Follow us:

Visuals of roof leakage and water logging from new Parliament (X/AkhileshYadav)

The newly inaugurated Parliament building, constructed at a cost exceeding Rs 1,250 crores under the Modi government, is facing significant criticism following reports of severe water logging issues. Several videos that have surfaced on social media platforms have sparked a heated debate about the quality of construction and the efficacy of the multi-billion rupee project.

The state-of-the-art facility, intended to symbolize the nation's progress and modernity, has instead become a focal point for controversy after recent monsoon rains revealed substantial water leakage problems. Critics argue that these issues highlight deficiencies in the building's design and construction, raising concerns about whether the new structure meets the high standards expected of such a prestigious government structure.

Adding fuel to the fire, the Samajwadi Party chief, Akhilesh Yadav, taking it to his X handle, said, “The old parliament was better than this new parliament, where even the old MPs could come and meet. Why not go back to the old parliament, at least till the time the water dripping program is going on in the parliament built with billions of rupees?

People are asking whether water dripping from every new roof constructed under the BJP government is a part of their well thought out design or…”

The new Parliament building, which was meant to showcase India’s architectural prowess and modernize its legislative processes, now faces criticism over its operational challenges. This situation highlights the broader concerns about the quality and accountability of major government projects, especially those involving substantial public expenditure.