Tejashwi Yadav accused of taking furniture, AC units, lights from vacated bungalow by BJP

The BJP has accused Tejashwi Yadav of taking furniture and fixtures from the government bungalow he vacated.

Follow us:

Tejashwi Yadav (ANI)

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has leveled allegations against former Bihar deputy chief minister Tejashwi Yadav, accusing him of removing furniture, light fixtures, air conditioners, and other items from the government bungalow he vacated. Danish Iqbal, the media in-charge of Bihar BJP, claimed on Monday that several essential items, including furniture, AC units, lights, and even a badminton court mat, were missing from the residence after Yadav vacated it.

According to Danish Iqbal, “The base of the bed, ACs, and lights were missing. Water outlets in the washroom were also removed. Items like the badminton court mat, fountain lights, and sofas were taken. It's evident that when Tejashwi Yadav left the bungalow, he took everything with him, which speaks volumes about his mentality.”

Iqbal further added, “I'm not just accusing him; it's been proven by what he left behind. The way he vacated the government property shows his upbringing and reveals a pattern of looting government assets.”

CCTV hard drives missing

In addition to these claims, Iqbal stated that the hard drives from the CCTV cameras installed at the residence were missing. These developments have caused disputes, especially as Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Chaudhary was expected to move into the bungalow during Navratri.

Union Minister Giriraj Singh also voiced concerns over the incident. He remarked, “A person holding a public position should not engage in such derogatory activities. An inquiry committee should investigate how much public money was spent on the bungalow, and a case should be registered.”

Legal developments for Yadav family

In related news, a Delhi court on Monday granted bail to RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav and his sons Tejashwi and Tej Pratap Yadav in the land-for-jobs scam. The court noted that they were not arrested during the investigation, requiring a personal bond of ₹1 lakh each.