Rahul Gandhi slams PM's silence over BJP MP's controversial remark on Constitution

During a public address in Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka BJP MP Anantkumar Hegde proposed amending the Constitution to reverse what he labeled as 'anti-Hindu' alterations made during Congress governance.

Author
Edited By: Satyam Singh
Follow us:

ANI

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi lashed out on Monday over Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'silence' regarding a controversial statement made by BJP MP Anantkumar Hegde, deeming it 'dangerous.' Hegde claimed that amending the Constitution to reverse perceived 'anti-Hindu' changes was made during Congress rule.

Rahul Gandhi said that the upcoming Lok Sabha elections is a clash of ideologies and framed it as a choice between upholding the Constitution (Samvidhan) or veering towards a different agenda (Sanghvidhan).

The Congress leader expressed the gravity of potential constitutional changes and asserted that altering India's foundational document, earned through the struggle for independence, would risk compromising the nation's hard-won freedom.

What did Anantkumar Hegde say about Constitution?

During a public address in Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka BJP MP Anantkumar Hegde proposed amending the Constitution to reverse what he labeled as 'anti-Hindu' alterations made during Congress governance. Hegde outlined the necessity of securing a two-thirds majority across parliamentary and state bodies for such amendments to take effect.

Moreover, Hegde stressed the BJP's aim to secure 400 seats in the upcoming Lok Sabha elections to facilitate the enactment of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).

However, responding to Hegde's statement, the BJP clarified that it does not align with the party's position and pledged to seek clarification from the Karnataka MP.

Hegde's previous controversies

Anantkumar Hegde drew criticism in 2017 when he advocated for constitutional changes, asserting the ruling BJP's intentions to amend the document. At the time, Hegde, serving as a Union Minister, stirred controversy by suggesting the Constitution's alteration despite its inclusion of the term 'secular.'