Patna High Court strikes down Nitish Kumar's 65 per cent quota policy in jobs, education

The court's decision came after a series of writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity of the amendments, arguing that the quota hike exceeded the Supreme Court's mandated 50% ceiling and violated fundamental rights to equality.

Author
Top Indian News Desk
Follow us:

On Thursday, the Patna High Court annulled the Bihar government's notification to increase the quota for backward classes, scheduled castes, and scheduled tribes from 50% to 65% in government jobs and higher educational institutions. The ruling came from a division bench led by Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran, responding to a series of writ petitions that challenged the constitutional validity of the legislation enacted by the Nitish Kumar government in November 2023.

The Bihar government had issued a gazette notification for two reservation bills—the Bihar Reservation of Vacancies in Posts and Services (For SC, ST, EBC, and OBC) Amendment Bill and the Bihar (In Admission In Educational Institutions) Reservation Amendment Bill, 2023. These bills aimed to increase the quota from the existing 50% to 65%, which, when combined with the 10% reservation for economically weaker sections (EWS), would have brought the total reservation to 75%.

Rationale Behind the Increase

The government based its decision on the findings of a caste survey conducted in the state. The survey results indicated a significant need for enhanced promotion of backward classes, scheduled castes, and scheduled tribes to achieve the constitutional goal of equality in opportunity and status. According to the gazette notification, the revised quotas were set at 20% for Scheduled Castes (SC), 2% for Scheduled Tribes (ST), 25% for Extremely Backward Classes (EBC), and 18% for Other Backward Classes (OBC).

Petitioners' Arguments

The petitioners contended that the state government overstepped its legislative powers by increasing the reservation quota. They argued that the amendments violated the Supreme Court's verdict in the case of Indira Sawhney vs. Union of India, which set a maximum reservation ceiling of 50%. The counsel for the petitioners claimed that the quota hike was discriminatory and infringed upon the fundamental rights to equality guaranteed under Articles 14, 15, and 16 of the Constitution.

In light of these arguments, the Patna High Court decided to set aside the Bihar government's notification, maintaining the established reservation ceiling of 50%.