KC Tyagi resigns as JD(U) spokesperson following 'conflict' with BJP

It is widely believed that Tyagi's frequent remarks, which often attracted national attention due to his experience and articulate delivery, were seen as potentially escalating tensions between the JD(U) and BJP.

Author
Edited By: Mayank Kasyap
Follow us:

KC Tyagi (ANI (File))

New Delhi: KC Tyagi, the seasoned spokesperson of Janata Dal (United) [JD(U)], has stepped down from his position following a series of public statements that underscored growing differences between his party and its ally, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Tyagi's resignation was formally announced by the party in an official statement.

It is widely believed that Tyagi's frequent remarks, which often attracted national attention due to his experience and articulate delivery, were seen as potentially escalating tensions between the JD(U) and BJP. His critical comments on several central government policies had reportedly been a point of contention, contributing to a strain in the alliance between the two parties.

New national spokesperson appointed

In the wake of Tyagi's departure, JD(U) president and Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar appointed Rajiv Ranjan Prasad as the party's new national spokesperson. The party stated that Tyagi resigned for "personal reasons," though insiders suggest the resignation came in response to internal pressure regarding his controversial remarks.

KC Tyagi was a prominent voice for the JD(U)

Tyagi has been a prominent voice within the JD(U) for years, often serving as a bridge between the party and the national media. His exit marks a significant shift in the party’s communication strategy, especially with the 2024 general elections approaching.

KC Tyagi’s resignation highlights the underlying tensions between JD(U) and BJP, despite both parties maintaining their alliance. The appointment of Rajiv Ranjan Prasad is expected to bring a new approach to JD(U)'s public messaging, while Tyagi’s departure could signal a more cautious stance in the party’s interactions with its key political ally.