Irrelevant has to be changed! NCERT chief on Babri Masjid's omission row

When questioned about omitting references to communal violence and the Babri Masjid demolition, Saklani argues against teaching such topics to young students. He stated, "Why should we teach about riots in school textbooks?" He added that we wanted to create positive citizens, not violent and depressed people.

Follow us:

Babri Masjid's omission row: Amidst controversy over recent textbook revisions, NCERT Director Dinesh Prasad Saklani stated that school education should focus on positivity rather than violence. The changes in NCERT textbooks, including the removal of references to the Babri Masjid demolition and BJP's Ram Rath Yatra, have sparked debates across the educational landscape. NCERT's curriculum impacts nearly 30,000 CBSE-affiliated schools nationwide. Saklani clarified in an interview with PTI that these revisions are part of routine updates, not attempts at saffronisation.

Reasoning behind changes

When questioned about omitting references to communal violence and the Babri Masjid demolition, Saklani argues against teaching such topics to young students. He stated, "Why should we teach about riots in school textbooks?" He added that we wanted to create positive citizens, not violent and depressed people.

Educational purpose

Saklani questions whether children should be taught about riots and hatred or if their understanding should be nurtured as they mature. He defends focusing on recent developments like the Supreme Court's decision on the Ram temple construction.

Addressing saffronisation allegations

Responding to accusations of saffronisation, Saklani asserted that updates reflect educational relevance. He defended the inclusion of historical and recent developments without ideological bias. Saklani defends teachings on India's historical achievements, such as the iron pillar in Mehrauli, challenging accusations of ideological influence.

Global educational standards

Updating textbooks is a global practice to enhance educational quality, Saklani notes, emphasizing that changes are driven by expert consultation rather than top-down imposition. The ongoing revisions are the fourth update cycle since 2014, aiming to enhance educational content aligned with evolving knowledge and pedagogical standards.