UP News: Asaduddin Owaisi, the chief of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM), has launched a vehement attack on Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court for his participation in a meeting organized by the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP). This incident has ignited a fierce debate about the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary in India, particularly concerning its relationship with right-wing organizations.Owaisis Sharp Critique of Judicial ConductIn a post on X, Owaisi expressed his dismay over the judges attendance at an event associated with the VHP, an organization that has faced multiple bans and is linked to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). He emphasized, The VHP was banned on various occasions. It is associated with RSS, an organisation that Vallabhai Patel banned for being a force of hate and violence.The VHP was banned on various occasions. It is associated with RSS, an organisation that Vallabhai Patel banned for being a force of hate and violence.It is unfortunate that a High Court judge attended the conference of such an organisation. This “speech” can be easily… https://t.co/IMce7aYbcf— Asaduddin Owaisi (@asadowaisi) December 9, 2024It is unfortunate that a High Court judge attended the conference of such an organisation. Owaisi underscored the expectation of judicial independence in India, stating that the Constitution of India expects judicial independence and impartiality from its judges.Concerns Over Majoritarianism in Judicial RemarksJustice Yadavs comments during the VHP event have also drawn significant scrutiny. He reportedly stated, I have no hesitation in saying that this is Hindustan (India), this country would function as per the wishes of the majority (i.e. the Hindus). This is the law.These remarks prompted Owaisi to question how minorities could expect fair treatment from a judge who aligns himself with such views. He remarked, In a democracy, the minoritys rights are protected, reinforcing that the Constitution of India is not majoritarian but a democratic one.The Implications of Justice Yadavs SpeechDuring his address, Justice Yadav discussed the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) and made controversial assertions regarding practices within different communities. He stated, You cant claim the right to have four wives, perform Halala, or practice Triple Talaq... UCC isnt something that VHP, RSS, or Hinduism advocates. These statements have raised alarms about potential biases in judicial interpretations and decisions regarding minority rights.Owaisi concluded by asserting that such speeches undermine judicial impartiality and questioned how minorities could seek justice from someone who actively participates in events organized by groups like the VHP. He cited Dr. B.R. Ambedkars principle that as a King has no Divine Right to rule, so also a majority has no Divine Right to rule, highlighting his concerns about justice in a diverse nation like India.This controversy not only raises questions about individual judges but also reflects broader concerns regarding the influence of political ideologies on judicial independence in India.
