EVM Saga: In a startling statement, senior Congress leader Digvijaya Singh has questioned the influence of electronic voting machines (EVMs) on electoral outcomes, asserting that it is the developers and installers of EVM software who wield the true power in elections. Citing the Election Commissions response to an RTI query, Singh expressed doubts about the transparency and authenticity of EVMs, emphasizing the pivotal role of private individuals in their operations.Unveiling Election Software DynamicsDigvijaya Singh referred to the Election Commissions admission, as per RTI information, that it lacks an in-house tech team, leaving the operations and functionalities of EVMs in the hands of private entities. Singh highlighted the absence of clarity regarding the origin and identity of these private individuals who handle crucial aspects of the electoral process. He argued that if software can impact votes, it is the software developers and installers, not the voters, who determine election outcomes.Putting Fate in Software Developers HandsExpressing concern, Singh suggested that the individual responsible for installing the software could effectively form the next government. He questioned whether the fate of over 90 crore voters should be entrusted to a handful of software developers and installers. According to Singh, the existing stakeholders, including voters, the Election Commission, and government officials, do not hold the reins of the electoral process—the true masters are the software developers and installers.Continued Concerns Across Political SpectrumThis statement follows earlier apprehensions expressed by Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh, who raised serious concerns about the Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) and Electronic Voting Machines (EVM). Rameshs communication with the Election Commission sought a meeting to discuss the concerns of the INDIA bloc, emphasizing the need for clarity on the usage of VVPATs in upcoming elections.Election Commissions Response and Counter-AllegationsIn response to Jairam Rameshs allegations, the Election Commission, on January 5, refuted the claims, asserting that information in the public domain adequately addresses EVM-related concerns. The Commission criticized Rameshs letter, dated December 30, 2023, as lacking new assertions or reasonable doubts requiring further clarification. The Commission countered Rameshs stance, emphasizing that judicial proceedings on EVMs do not hinder discussions or hearings on the concerns raised by political parties.Digvijaya Singhs remarks add another layer to the ongoing debate on the authenticity and transparency of EVMs in India. With concerns echoed across party lines, the Election Commission faces the challenge of addressing these apprehensions and ensuring public confidence in the electoral process. The assertion that software developers hold a decisive role in elections adds complexity to the broader discourse on electoral integrity.
