In a recent statement, Tamil Nadus DMK leader Regupathy claimed that Lord Ram was a forerunner of the Dravidian model. This remark has sparked a significant reaction from the BJP, highlighting the ongoing ideological battle between the Dravidian and Hindutva narratives in Indian politics.Regupathys Controversial StatementSpeaking at an event, DMK leader and Tamil Nadu Law Minister S. Regupathy asserted that Lord Ram, a central figure in Hindu mythology, exemplified principles that align with the Dravidian model of governance. According to Regupathy, Lord Rams rule was characterized by fairness, justice, and equality—values that the Dravidian model also upholds.BJPs Sharp ResponseThe BJP was quick to respond to Regupathys statement, with party leaders condemning the remarks as an attempt to distort Hindu traditions and mythology. BJP spokespersons argued that Lord Ram has always been a symbol of the Ram Rajya, which aligns with the values promoted by the Hindutva ideology rather than the Dravidian model. The Dravidian model, primarily associated with the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and other Dravidian parties in Tamil Nadu, emphasizes social justice, rationalism, and a strong opposition to caste discrimination. It advocates for the upliftment of marginalized communities and promotes secularism and equality.Lord Ram, the protagonist of the ancient Indian epic Ramayana, is revered as an ideal king who ruled with compassion, integrity, and wisdom. The concept of Ram Rajya, or the rule of Lord Ram, is often cited as an archetype of just and benevolent governance in Hindu philosophy. Regupathys remarks seem to be an attempt to bridge the ideological differences between the Dravidian and Hindutva models. By portraying Lord Ram as a proponent of values similar to those of the Dravidian model, Regupathy may be seeking to create a more inclusive narrative that resonates with a broader section of the populace.
