Parliament Security Breach: The Delhi Police vehemently opposed the bail plea of Neelam Azad, one of the accused in the Parliament security breach case, asserting that the accused is implicated in an offence punishable by life imprisonment or even the death penalty.
The police underscored the gravity, seriousness, and heinous nature of the allegations against the accused. According to law enforcement, the accused individuals are charged with actions that disrupt the sovereignty and integrity of India.
In their argument, the police stressed the existence of strong, cogent, convincing, clinching, and credible material, evidence, and documents against Neelam Azad. The prosecution firmly contended that the abundance of evidence disentitles her from being granted bail.
The police maintained that the available material, evidence, and documentary proof indicate Neelam Azad's complicity in the offence, further justifying the denial of bail. The ongoing investigation was cited as a reason against extending bail, with reasonable grounds pointing to the accused's involvement.
Highlighting the accused persons' power and influence, the Delhi Police argued that their release on bail could pose a detriment to the investigating agency. The nature, gravity, and severity of the offence were also emphasized as crucial considerations when weighing the possibility of bail.
Advocate Akhand Pratap Singh appeared on behalf of the Delhi Police, while Advocate Suresh Chaudhary represented Neelam Azad. The accused had recently filed a bail plea, citing a violation of Article 22 due to not being produced before the court within 24 hours of arrest.
Following the conclusion of arguments, Additional Sessions Judge Dr Hardeep Kaur reserved the order, scheduling the pronouncement for January 18, 2024. The case revolves around a security breach at Parliament on December 13, 2023, coinciding with the anniversary of the Parliament attack case, with all six individuals involved currently in judicial custody.
Copyright © 2025 Top Indian News
