During the hearing, the judge questioned the validity of the claim and suggested that the wife should consider earning her own income instead of relying entirely on maintenance payments. (X)
New Delhi: In a recent ruling by the Karnataka High Court, a wife’s request for substantial monthly maintenance was met with skepticism by the presiding judge. The woman had sought a total of ₹6,16,000 per month from her estranged husband, outlining various expenses, including ₹4-5 lakhs for knee pain and physiotherapy, ₹15,000 for shoes and dresses, ₹60,000 for food at home, and additional funds for dining out.
During the hearing, the judge questioned the validity of the claim and suggested that the wife should consider earning her own income instead of relying entirely on maintenance payments. The court’s decision reflects a growing trend in which judges are scrutinizing the necessity and fairness of maintenance claims in divorce proceedings.
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT :
— Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj (@DeepikaBhardwaj) August 21, 2024
Wife asking for 6,16,000 per month maintenance
4-5 Lacs per month for knee pain, physiotherapy
15000 per month for shoes dresses
60000 per month for food inside home
Few more thousands for dining outside home
JUDGE : ASK HER TO EARN 🤣 pic.twitter.com/G0LUpIaA33
The wife’s maintenance petition included:
The judge remarked, "Ask her to earn," indicating a preference for self-sufficiency over financial support solely based on maintenance claims. This response highlights the judiciary’s emphasis on encouraging financial independence among claimants.
The ruling has sparked a debate regarding the balance between fair support and financial self-reliance. Many view the judge’s suggestion as a step towards encouraging individuals to support themselves, while others express concerns about the adequacy of financial support for those in genuine need.
Copyright © 2025 Top Indian News
