US Elections 2024: Why has Biden administration halted new LNG export facilities to combat climate crisis?

US Elections 2024: Research suggests that LNG's overall greenhouse gas impact is approximately 25 percent worse than coal, even with advanced technologies.

Author
Mayank Kasyap
Follow us:
Courtesy: X

US Elections 2024: In a significant move to address the pressing climate emergency, the Biden administration has announced a temporary halt on new liquified natural gas (LNG) export facilities. The decision underscores President Biden's commitment to accelerating the transition away from fossil fuels and towards renewable energy sources.

US Elections 2024: Biden's climate agenda

The decision to pause new LNG approvals reflects the Biden administration's recognition of the climate crisis as an existential threat. President Biden reaffirmed this stance, highlighting the urgency of tackling climate change while criticising opponents who deny its reality.

“This pause on new LNG approvals sees the climate crisis for what it is: the existential threat of our time,” said President Biden in a statement. “While MAGA Republicans willfully deny the urgency of the climate crisis, condemning the American people to a dangerous future, my Administration will not be complacent.”

US Elections 2024: Impact, review process

As the world's leading LNG exporter, the US currently operates seven terminals, exporting approximately 11.6 billion cubic feet per day. The pause on new export facilities will subject future applications to comprehensive reviews, considering their environmental, economic, and climate impacts.

Notably, the decision affects proposed projects such as Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass 2 (CP2) in Louisiana, which experts estimate could release emissions equivalent to 42 million cars annually.

US Elections 2024: Reactions and responses

The announcement has garnered mixed reactions from various stakeholders. While environmental activists and scientists applaud the decision, industry groups express concern about its potential consequences.

Dan Lashof, director of the World Resources Institute, emphasised the importance of a thorough review, stating that expanding fossil fuel supplies could impede the transition to renewable energy.

However, industry groups like the Independent Petroleum Association of America argue that the plan could strengthen Russian influence in the European gas market.

US Elections 2024: Environmental and economic implications

Critics of LNG exports highlight their adverse environmental impacts and economic consequences. While natural gas is often perceived as a cleaner alternative to coal and oil, its lifecycle emissions, including methane leaks, pose significant environmental risks.

Research suggests that LNG's overall greenhouse gas impact is approximately 25 percent worse than coal, even with advanced technologies. Moreover, LNG exports have led to price hikes for gas and electricity in the US, affecting consumers nationwide.

US Elections 2024: Local concerns in Louisiana

In Louisiana, existing LNG development has raised concerns about environmental degradation and community displacement. Coastal wetlands have been destroyed, leaving residents vulnerable to the increasing frequency of hurricanes.

Anne Rolfes, director of the Louisiana Bucket Brigade, emphasised the detrimental impact of LNG development on coastal ecosystems and communities. Fisherman Travis Dardar echoed these concerns, highlighting the decline in catches and the sacrifices made for the petrochemical industry's expansion, AFP reported.

The temporary halt on new LNG export facilities reflects a pivotal moment in the Biden administration's climate agenda, underscoring the imperative to address the climate crisis while balancing economic interests and environmental sustainability.