Donald Trump, Kamala Harris (Flickr)
The first and potentially only presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris has ended after several notable moments. Throughout the debate, Harris was seen frequently smiling, while Trump maintained a more neutral expression. Harris also used more hand gestures than Trump.
The two candidates shared the debate stage on Tuesday, September 10, to address a range of issues. Political commentators have since started to offer their views on who might have come out on top.
House GOP Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik declared Trump the winner. She praised his focus on "reining in inflation, strengthening the economy, securing borders, and pursuing peace through a strong foreign policy." Stefanik criticised Harris for trying to hide from her past support for policies like banning fracking and raising taxes. She emphasised that Trump held her accountable for "Kamalanomics," which she claimed contributed to inflation, and for being weak on the world stage. Stefanik also criticised the moderators for being biased in Harris' favour, allowing her to repeatedly lie without challenge.
Retired teacher Ron Gregrich shared a similar sentiment, saying that Harris appeared "glamorous" with her expressive facial gestures, but Trump’s repeated policy points made him the winner in substance, even if not visually.
Conversely, some commentators on Fox News, such as Brit Hume, believed Harris had the upper hand. Hume called her "well-prepared" and noted that she successfully derailed Trump at various moments. He stated that she managed to bait him, throwing him off balance during the debate.
Other analysts like Harold Ford Jr. echoed these views, agreeing that Harris "won the night."
Swing-state voters interviewed by The Washington Post tended to favour Harris, saying that while Trump rambled and missed opportunities, Harris delivered a confident and coherent performance. One voter remarked that Harris appeared more professional and prepared than ever, with another stating that she successfully made her case as a better candidate.
Northeastern University political experts noted a clear contrast between the two in terms of style and vision. Martha Johnson pointed out that Harris projected authority and gravitas, while Nick Beauchamp observed her strategy to bait Trump into anger. They also commented on the gender dynamics at play, suggesting that the split-screen format worked in Harris' favour by neutralising Trump's physical advantage.
Copyright © 2025 Top Indian News
