Prisoner in his body: Man paralyzed by tasing files $100 million lawsuit against Colorado Springs police

The Colorado Springs Police Department has stood by Officer Comstock, asserting that his actions were justified and within department policy.

Follow us:

Root's lawsuit alleges excessive use of force and seeks $100 million in damages. The lawsuit highlights the devastating impact of the incident on Root’s life. (X/CollinRugg)

New Delhi: Jacob Root, a 27-year-old man who attempted to flee after stealing a car, has filed a $100 million lawsuit against the Colorado Springs Police Department following a tasing incident that left him paralyzed. Root, now a quadriplegic, claims that the actions of Officer Robert Comstock during the arrest led to his life-altering injury.

The incident and Its aftermath

The incident occurred when Officer Comstock deployed a taser to subdue Root, who was attempting to escape police custody after stealing a vehicle. According to Root’s legal team, the fall from being tased caused him to break his neck, resulting in permanent paralysis. Despite the severity of the injury, the Colorado Springs Police Department has cleared Officer Comstock of any wrongdoing, stating that he remains a valued member of the force.

Root's legal battle

Root's lawsuit alleges excessive use of force and seeks $100 million in damages.The lawsuit highlights the devastating impact of the incident on Root’s life. He now requires full-time care, relying on others for basic needs such as eating and personal hygiene.

Speaking about his condition, Root expressed his frustration and despair: “That officer pretty much made a choice for me to be a prisoner in my body.” His legal team argues that the use of the taser was unnecessary and resulted in irreversible damage.

Police department's response

The Colorado Springs Police Department has stood by Officer Comstock, asserting that his actions were justified and within department policy. In a statement, they said, “Officer Comstock is a valued employee and is in good standing with the department.” This stance has sparked debate over the use of force and the accountability of law enforcement officers.