ANI
The Delhi High Court made a decisive ruling on Monday, rejecting a plea that sought a six-year ban on Prime Minister Narendra Modi from contesting elections. The plea, filed by lawyer Anand S Jondhale, alleged violations of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) during an election rally in Uttar Pradesh.
Justice Sachin Datta, presiding over a single judge bench, dismissed the plea as "thoroughly misconceived." The court emphasized that it cannot direct the Election Commission to take a specific stance on complaints related to the model code of conduct.
In another heartburn to librandus, Delhi High Court throws out petition aiming to disqualify PM Narendra Modi over alleged religious remarks during ongoing Lok Sabha elections pic.twitter.com/c8FvLuU37b
— Megh Updates 🚨™ (@MeghUpdates) April 29, 2024
The petitioner's plea rested on accusations that PM Modi had referenced Hindu and Sikh deities during an election rally in Pilbhit, Uttar Pradesh, on April 9. The Prime Minister's remarks, particularly regarding the construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya and the political actions of certain parties, were at the heart of the complaint.
The court highlighted that the petitioner had already approached the Election Commission with the complaint. The Election Commission, through Advocate Siddhant Kumar, assured that the complaint would be duly processed and addressed.
During the rally supporting BJP's candidate from Pilbhit, Jitin Prasada, PM Modi made statements about the Ram Temple and the ongoing politics surrounding it. His remarks sparked controversy and led to legal scrutiny, culminating in the recent court ruling.
The court's decision carries significance in the context of election conduct and the legal avenues available for addressing alleged violations of the Model Code of Conduct. It underscores the Election Commission's role in adjudicating such matters independently.
Copyright © 2025 Top Indian News
